Bill Gates told Congress that Jeffrey Epstein tried to use information about his repeated affairs during his marriage to Melinda Gates to pressure him into maintaining contact.
The Microsoft co-founder, 70, testified before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, June 10th, as lawmakers continued their investigation into the late financier and his connections to prominent figures. Gates has not been accused of any criminal wrongdoing in connection with the convicted sex offender, and told lawmakers he neither participated in nor witnessed illegal conduct during their interactions.
Women Are Swapping Their Boring Water For This Ice Pop Electrolyte Mix!
Bill Gates Says Jeffrey Epstein Used His Affairs To Pressure Him Into Reconnecting
"I never witnessed nor had any indication that Epstein was engaged in ongoing criminal conduct," Gates said in his opening statement, according to CNN and Forbes.
"I never went to his island, his ranch, or his Florida home. I have never victimized anyone," the billionaire continued. "While he may have sought to foster a personal relationship, I was never interested in that and never reciprocated."
Gates then went on to talk about how Epstein was using what he knew about his repeated affairs as a way to maintain contact with him, adding: "I learned Epstein had become aware of sensitive information about my personal life, including the fact that I had been unfaithful in my marriage. These affairs had nothing to do with my interactions with Epstein, but they were painful for my family."
Bill Gates Says Meeting Epstein Was A 'Grave Error In Judgement'
Gates said he was introduced to Epstein back in 2011, noting he believed Epstein could help raise large sums for global health initiatives. "I recall being aware that Epstein had faced prior legal issues, but I did not fully understand the extent of the crimes he committed. I accepted the introduction without applying the scrutiny I should have," Gates went on.
He added that his meetings with Epstein were focused on philanthropy and fundraising rather than personal matters, describing the decision to meet him as a "grave error in judgement" that put his philanthropic work at risk.
